Friday: Arrived home off the red eye at around 7:30am. Straight into conference calls. I had a 30 minute window so I decided to try out my new dynamic rowing machine.
I struggled a bit with getting everything set up. My main problem was that the PM5 was trying to connect to a hr monitor that I was not wearing instead of the one that I was. That took some time to get fixed.
I did a 5 minute row, then a 3 minute row, and then I got stuff set for a final 12 minute row. I did the first 9 minutes at 175W, and then the last 3 at 225W.
Saturday: No training. Doing errands and chores all day. No time.
Sunday: Just an easy session to get used to the new machine.
- 3 x 20′ / 1′ rest
- 175 W
- No rate restriction
- HR cap at 155
It was hard work. The break through that I made before I went on the road for a week seems to have disappeared. I’m back to where I was a couple of weeks ago.
I wanted to get an idea of how this compared to rowing on the model D, so I matched it up with one of the 2×30′ sessions that I did a couple of weekends ago on the cape. I was similarly fatigued and jetlagged then.
Here is all the parameters compared on a time scale.
- Slightly higher power today.
- About 1 spm higher rate is where I settled today. I think 1 to 2 spm higher on the dynamic is probably about right.
- HR response nearly identical
- Peak and average force about the same, but the force ratio is lower on the dynamic (less efficient?)
- Drive length. Started shorter on dynamic, but eventually came close. I was surprised about this, I expected it to be consistently shorter without my bodies momentum carrying me into the catch.
- Work per stroke decreasing through the row.
- Drive speed, a much more noticeable difference. Significantly higher on the dynamic.
I might do a second session this evening, maybe a first cut at the CTC.
The drive speed and stroke rate are probably correlated.
Do you know that on rowsandall.com you can select “Dynamic Indoor Rower” as the workout type?
LikeLiked by 1 person
I do know that! And I did.
LikeLike