Saturday: Last row of the season?

It was beautiful out today.  Clear skies and sunny.  Upper 30s at the start, rising to around 45F by the time we finished.  A light wind from the north was a gentle tail wind heading downlake and a head wind heading up lake.  Enough to effect the pace a bit, but not enough to stir up any chop.  I can’t imagine a better day for rowing.

I was in my single and Joe, Heri, Leanne and Pam were in the quad.  I had a simple training plan.

  • Stay with the quad.

All I really wanted to do was row, and I was enjoying the company.  They were going easy sometimes and then doing some power pieces. I just try to match pace with them.  We headed downlake first, at a reasonably hard steady state pace for me.  Then a bit easier heading up lake, although with the head wind, it felt almost as hard.

After the narrows, I could hear when Joe would call for a 10 or a 20 and I would increase the pressure to stay even with them.  We took a brief break just north of the Route 9 bridge, and then continued to the north end of the lake.  From the QRA boathouse, the quad picked up the rate and I matched to them.

We took another break and started to head home.  Joe said that they were going to take it easy until 2/3 of the way home, and then do a hard 500m piece.  Rowing downlake, I got a bit ahead of them and then slowed to a paddle around the start of the 500.  I saw them take up the rate and I waited until they were about a length behind me and I did the same.  Because they were at speed and I was still accelerating, they pulled a little bit ahead of me by the time I was about 20 strokes into it.  I pushed up the rate and I started to claw them back so we were even at 40 strokes.  We finished around stroke 55 for me, and I was maybe a quarter length up on them.  It was fun doing it side by side like that.

Then an easy paddle back to the dock.  After we landed, I took off my rigger and packed my boat into the back of the boathouse for the winter.  😦

Screen Shot 2016-11-19 at 10.42.21 AM.png

 

Workout Summary - media/20161119-152227-79032o.csv
--|Total|-Total-|--Avg--|-Avg-|Avg-|-Avg-|-Max-|-Avg
--|Dist-|-Time--|-Pace--|-Pwr-|SPM-|-HR--|-HR--|-DPS
--|11996|68:58.0|02:52.5|000.0|20.0|145.4|171.0|08.7
W-|10100|48:19.0|02:23.6|000.0|20.5|151.6|171.0|10.2
R-|01896|20:39.0|05:26.7|000.0|18.0|125.8|171.0|06.1
Workout Details
#-|SDist|-Split-|-SPace-|-Pwr-|SPM-|AvgHR|MaxHR|DPS-
02|03300|15:18.7|02:19.2|000.0|20.4|153.2|167.0|10.6
03|03300|16:26.5|02:29.5|000.0|19.4|151.4|163.0|10.3
04|02000|09:29.1|02:22.3|000.0|21.7|155.2|170.0|09.7
05|01000|05:01.1|02:30.6|000.0|18.7|137.7|142.0|10.6
06|00500|02:04.6|02:04.6|000.0|28.1|159.4|171.0|08.6

I did some quick analysis of the row. Looking at pace versus stroke rate.  These two plots show tail wind and head wind difference.  Tail wind is on the left.  Head wind is on the right.

Finally, here is a view of the last 500m piece.  You can see my rate and pace increasing at the beginning.

bokeh_plot-51

Tomorrow:  L3 half marathon.  Aiming to do a bit better than the 1:23:33 from last week.

Monday: 4 x 2800m Threshold OTW

In Newton in my Fluid

Weather:  36F, Clear, light wind from the NNW 3-5mph.  This was a head wind heading down river.  It was only a factor in the straight section in front of the watch factory.

Plan:

  • 4 x 2800m
  • 3-5min rest
  • Rate: 24-26
  • Pace: ~2:15
  • HR Cap: None –> Target TR zone
  • Technique:  Clean Finishes.

Screen Shot 2016-11-07 at 9.55.57 AM.png

Workout Summary - media/20161107-143843-78581o.csv
--|Total|-Total-|--Avg--|Avg-|-Avg-|-Max-|-Avg
--|Dist-|-Time--|-Pace--|SPM-|-HR--|-HR--|-DPS
--|13608|71:23.0|02:37.4|23.1|150.5|170.0|08.2
W-|11198|51:40.0|02:18.4|24.8|160.0|170.0|08.7
R-|03680|27:30.0|03:44.3|19.1|123.4|170.0|07.9
Workout Details
#-|SDist|-Split-|-SPace-|SPM-|AvgHR|MaxHR|DPS-
02|02820|12:55.7|02:17.5|25.1|158.4|164.0|08.7
03|02804|12:46.9|02:16.8|24.7|160.1|166.0|08.9
04|02753|13:05.1|02:22.6|24.5|160.9|166.0|08.6
05|02821|12:52.3|02:16.9|24.9|160.4|170.0|08.8

A very good workout.  I pushed hard, but tried to stick to r24, and that kept the HR in a reasonable place.  I wanted to focus more on rowing clean than driving for the best possible pace.

The one interesting thing from the workout is the sharp deceleration at 6000m.  I was going through the s-turn and a goose did not get out of my way quickly enough.  I hit it hard with my oar during recovery, and lost my grip on the handle.  Luckily, the force of the “bird strike” pushed the handle toward my torso.  It was trapped between my leg and chest and I could grab it again quickly.  Good thing too, because the blade was flipping from feathered to square and starting to really catch water.  I think I avoided a flip by a fraction of a second.  Usually the geese are smart enough to get out of my way.  I think this specific goose will probably do so in the future.

Here’s a quick look at stroke metrics.

bokeh_plot-31The loop down to 20 spm at the bottom is my “bird strike”.

I did a plot of each interval to see if I could see the effect of the light headwind.  The left column is against the headwind, the right column is with the wind.

Now I am off to San Jose and LA for the week.  I will probably stick to cross training at hotel gyms for this trip.  Maybe try to do a couple of strength sessions.

Thursday: 4 x (5 x 2′ / 30″ paddle) / 3′ rest

On the Upper Charles.  In my fluid.

Weather:  Cold, calm, clear and dark!  30F when I launched, 31F when I finished.  The water was glassy smooth.  It was so calm that I noticed the tiny wake that a goose made when he paddled by in the opposite direction (and I resented the goose for spoiling my perfect water!)

Plan:

  • 4 sets of 5 x 2′ on / 30″ paddle
  • 3 or 4 minutes of rest between sets
  • rate: 26-28
  • pace: better than 2:15
  • HR: No cap.  Threshold workout
  • Technique:  full compression, level draw, crisp tap down, smooth recovery

The number of reps in each set is designed to cover the distance down the river so that I get my long rest when I need to turn at the end.  The intent of this workout is to work  at head race pace and stroke rates with enough rests so that it is more focused on technique than survival.  It worked out as planned.

| Tstart_ | Dist_ | Time_ | _Pace_ | SPM_ | avgHR | _DPS___ | Remarks
 | 00:00.0 | 01166 | 08:00 | 3:25.8 | 15.2 | 119.3 | 09.6 | warming up
 | 08:00.0 | 00451 | 01:59 | 2:11.9 | 25.9 | 151.5 | 08.8 | 
 | 09:59.0 | 00090 | 00:30 | 2:46.7 | 20.7 | 155.1 | 08.7 | 
 | 10:29.0 | 00462 | 02:00 | 2:09.9 | 26.9 | 158.1 | 08.6 | 
 | 12:29.0 | 00079 | 00:30 | 3:09.9 | 19.6 | 159.8 | 08.1 | 
 | 12:59.0 | 00452 | 02:00 | 2:12.7 | 26.8 | 158.3 | 08.4 | 
 | 14:59.0 | 00075 | 00:30 | 3:20.0 | 19.7 | 160.9 | 07.6 | 
 | 15:29.0 | 00473 | 02:01 | 2:07.9 | 27.1 | 160.6 | 08.7 | 
 | 17:30.0 | 00078 | 00:29 | 3:05.9 | 21.4 | 165.2 | 07.5 | 
 | 17:59.0 | 00470 | 02:00 | 2:07.7 | 27.9 | 165.0 | 08.4 | 
 | 19:59.0 | 00323 | 03:00 | 4:38.6 | 20.2 | 135.8 | 05.3 | 
 | 22:59.0 | 00454 | 02:00 | 2:12.2 | 26.9 | 152.0 | 08.4 | 
 | 24:59.0 | 00084 | 00:30 | 2:58.6 | 21.6 | 164.3 | 07.8 | 
 | 25:29.0 | 00447 | 02:00 | 2:14.2 | 27.5 | 164.8 | 08.1 | 
 | 27:29.0 | 00078 | 00:30 | 3:12.3 | 21.7 | 167.5 | 07.2 | 
 | 27:59.0 | 00444 | 02:00 | 2:15.1 | 26.8 | 166.5 | 08.3 | 
 | 29:59.0 | 00082 | 00:31 | 3:09.0 | 25.2 | 170.0 | 06.3 | 
 | 30:30.0 | 00437 | 01:59 | 2:16.2 | 27.2 | 167.6 | 08.1 | 
 | 32:29.0 | 00069 | 00:30 | 3:37.4 | 21.0 | 170.3 | 06.6 | 
 | 32:59.0 | 00445 | 02:00 | 2:14.8 | 26.3 | 167.2 | 08.5 | 
 | 34:59.0 | 00415 | 04:00 | 4:49.2 | 18.9 | 136.7 | 05.5 | 
 | 38:59.0 | 00460 | 02:00 | 2:10.4 | 26.8 | 153.5 | 08.6 | 
 | 40:59.0 | 00084 | 00:30 | 2:58.6 | 21.3 | 163.6 | 07.9 | 
 | 41:29.0 | 00447 | 02:00 | 2:14.2 | 27.4 | 163.3 | 08.2 | 
 | 43:29.0 | 00084 | 00:30 | 2:58.6 | 22.0 | 166.7 | 07.6 | 
 | 43:59.0 | 00447 | 02:00 | 2:14.2 | 26.2 | 165.3 | 08.5 | 
 | 45:59.0 | 00093 | 00:31 | 2:46.7 | 21.5 | 166.6 | 08.4 | 
 | 46:30.0 | 00445 | 01:59 | 2:13.7 | 27.0 | 164.9 | 08.3 | 
 | 48:29.0 | 00078 | 00:30 | 3:12.3 | 21.3 | 167.2 | 07.3 | 
 | 48:59.0 | 00454 | 02:00 | 2:12.2 | 27.4 | 167.2 | 08.3 | 
 | 50:59.0 | 00215 | 03:00 | 6:58.6 | 18.2 | 134.5 | 03.9 | 
 | 53:59.0 | 00455 | 02:00 | 2:11.9 | 26.8 | 153.4 | 08.5 | 
 | 55:59.0 | 00081 | 00:30 | 3:05.2 | 21.2 | 163.2 | 07.7 | 
 | 56:29.0 | 00440 | 02:00 | 2:16.4 | 25.8 | 163.6 | 08.5 | 
 | 58:29.0 | 00082 | 00:30 | 3:02.9 | 21.3 | 165.1 | 07.7 | 
 | 58:59.0 | 00437 | 02:01 | 2:18.4 | 26.1 | 164.8 | 08.3 | 
 | 01:00.0 | 00076 | 00:29 | 3:10.8 | 21.7 | 166.6 | 07.2 | 
 | 01:29.0 | 00437 | 02:00 | 2:17.3 | 26.2 | 165.7 | 08.3 | 
 | 03:29.0 | 00079 | 00:30 | 3:09.9 | 20.4 | 167.7 | 07.7 | 
 | 03:59.0 | 00449 | 02:00 | 2:13.6 | 26.7 | 167.7 | 08.4 | 
 | 05:59.0 | 01455 | 10:20 | 3:33.1 | 18.1 | 127.8 | 07.8 |

| Tstart_ | Dist_ | Time_ | _Pace_ | SPM_ | avgHR | _DPS___ | Remarks
 | 00:00.0 | 01166 | 08:00 | 3:25.8 | 15.2 | 119.3 | 09.6 | warmup
 | 00:00.0 | 02245 | 18:00 | 4:00.5 | 20.1 | 148.8 | 06.2 | rests
 | 00:00.0 | 01455 | 10:20 | 3:33.1 | 18.1 | 127.8 | 07.8 | cool down
 | 00:00.0 | 09006 | 39:59 | 2:13.2 | 26.8 | 162.1 | 08.4 | main set

I was hoping to be a bit faster, but it wasn’t gonna happen for me today.  I suspect that the hard workout from Tuesday, plus 90 minutes yesterday has built up a little fatigue.

I also was not pushing this to the edge.  In each interval, when it started to bite, I tried to refocus on technique.  Try to get my finishes so clean that I wouldn’t touch the water, and really get out for the catch.  With water this smooth, it was hard to row badly!

I was curious what my stroke dynamics look like.  Here are a few strokes from the begining and end of the workout.

screen-shot-2016-10-27-at-10-00-33-am

You can compare that to last year.

screen-shot-2015-11-01-at-10-09-29-am

It looks like some subtle changes.

  • This year, it looks like I am getting a bit more impulse from my leg drive.  The acceleration curve is peaking more at 0.4 sec.
  • It looks like my finishes were a bit cleaner last year.
  • See how the boat speed is peaking right before the catch last year?  That means that I am accelerating up the slide.  This year in two out of three strokes, the boat speed is nice and flat through the recovery, so a smoother, more even recovery.  You can also see this in terms of the minimum instantaneous boat speed.  Last year, it troughed well below 2.5m/s.  This year, all strokes troughed above 2.5m/s.  That’s good.

Tomorrow:  The weather is supposed to be terrible.  I might do an erg session.  I should probably do a 4 x 20′ endurance session, but I might do a rate limited 10K to post a CTC number.

Cold Enough for Pogies! 90′ of steady state

On the upper charles in my fluid.

Weather:  Cold and clear,  35F.  Light wind from the ESE.  This was a bit of a head wind coming up river.  Another absolutely stunning day.

Plan:

  • As much steady state as I had time for.  ( turned out to be nearly 90 minutes)
  • rate: 20
  • pace: ~2:30
  • HR: Capped at 155
  • Technique:  good compression, level drive, crisp finishes

screen-shot-2016-10-26-at-10-35-09-am

I got to the dock about 20 minutes earlier today than yesterday and the difference was dramatic.  It was really dark!  I could see a few lights out in the lagoon heading down river when I got my boat, but I could see the boats that they were on.

By the time I got in my boat, my eyes had adjusted enough that I could see a little bit, but I was still pretty tentative.  The river is narrow enough at the beginning that it is shaded by trees on both sides, so it is really dark in places.  As I started the turn out of the lagoon, I saw lights ahead.  One was on a four that had steering off into the weeds on the inside of the turn.  The other was a launch.  I couldn’t tell which way the launch was heading so I stopped and inspected the situation closely, then paddled through the whole situation.  After I passed those two boats, there was one more four a bit further down  the river.  I saw no more of them after that.

For today, my objectives were pretty simple.  Work on building my aerobic base by getting in lots of minutes or rowing.  And more importantly, try to work on correcting the flaws in my stroke.  In the double, I was rowing way to deep (over the barrel), and my finishes were very sloppy.  Today, I was trying to maintain an internal monologue during every stroke.  It went something like this.

(starting right after the finish)

  • Get those blades off the water, don’t be lazy, you don’t need training wheels
  • Easy up the slide.  keep it smooth
  • Don’t hunch, keep your shoulders high in to the catch
  • Reach way out there, don’t be a chicken
  • drop the blades first, then accelerate
  • keep the handles nice and low, don’t go deep
  • push hands down and away crisply.  Don’t let your hands brush your torso
  • Get those blades up.

Over and over.  Sometimes I would get focused on one part of it, especially the finishes and I would start to hunch or drag my blades, but this was some of the hardest concentration that I have done in a steady state session.

After I finished my usual 2 full laps of the river, I had time to add in another 2k or so rowing.  This part I did with slow roll ups.  I would finish, feather, and then roll to square slowly through the whole recovery.  This was a good change because it still required a lot of concentration, but was a bit of change.

Sometimes I just want to row, but right now, I really want to try to break some habits and start some new ones.  It ain’t easy.

Data from RIM.

| Tstart_ | Dist_ | Time_ | _Pace_ | SPM_ | avgHR | _DPS___ | Remarks
 | 00:00.0 | 00705 | 05:32 | 3:55.5 | 12.5 | 112.8 | 10.2 | warming up
 | 05:32.0 | 03357 | 16:19 | 2:25.8 | 19.4 | 141.1 | 10.6 | 
 | 21:51.0 | 00111 | 01:08 | 5:06.3 | 18.6 | 133.3 | 05.3 | 
 | 22:59.0 | 02803 | 13:49 | 2:27.9 | 19.9 | 149.5 | 10.2 | 
 | 36:48.0 | 00053 | 02:01 | 19:01.5| 15.7 | 120.8 | 01.7 | 
 | 38:49.0 | 02846 | 13:38 | 2:23.7 | 20.1 | 147.8 | 10.4 | 
 | 52:27.0 | 00088 | 00:59 | 5:35.2 | 18.7 | 142.3 | 04.8 | 
 | 53:26.0 | 02809 | 14:02 | 2:29.9 | 20.1 | 151.0 | 10.0 | 
 | 07:28.0 | 00103 | 01:17 | 6:13.8 | 14.9 | 134.5 | 05.4 | 
 | 08:45.0 | 01090 | 05:21 | 2:27.2 | 20.0 | 144.9 | 10.2 | 
 | 14:06.0 | 00099 | 01:18 | 6:33.9 | 20.3 | 133.2 | 03.7 | 
 | 15:24.0 | 01186 | 05:58 | 2:30.9 | 20.6 | 146.1 | 09.6 | 
 | 21:22.0 | 01120 | 05:51 | 2:36.7 | 20.8 | 146.7 | 09.2 |

| Tstart_ | Dist_ | Time_ | _Pace_ | SPM_ | avgHR | _DPS___ | Remarks
 | 00:00.0 | 00705 | 05:32 | 3:55.5 | 12.5 | 112.8 | 10.2 | warmup
 | 00:00.0 | 00454 | 06:43 | 7:23.8 | 17.4 | 131.1 | 03.9 | rests
 | 00:00.0 | 01120 | 05:51 | 2:36.7 | 20.8 | 146.7 | 09.2 | cool down
 | 00:00.0 | 14091 | 09:07 | 2:27.2 | 19.9 | 146.8 | 10.2 | main set

I always feel a little bit better when I can stick with a HR cap and still do a steady state session with the avg pace faster than 2:30.

Tuesday: 5 x 1500

On the Upper Charles in Newton in my single

Weather:  Cold and stunningly beautiful.  There was frost on the dock, and the air temp was around 36F.  There was no wind at all at first.  Over the course of the session, a little bit of wind from the east started, but it was barely noticeable.

The river level was high because of all the rain we got over the weekend.  From the GPS data, it looks like the flow was a bit higher than usual (my calculation about 0.02 m/s)  This is about a second plus or minus on pace depending on whether you are heading up of down river.

Plan:

  • Short warmup
  • 5 x 1500m / 5′ rest
    • rate: 26-28
    • pace: faster than 2:15
    • No HR cap.  Threshold intensity
  • Square blade rowing for cool down

Screen Shot 2016-10-25 at 11.15.22 AM.png

TCX data from RIM

Workout Summary - media/20161025-133204-77854o.csv
--|Total|-Total-|--Avg--|Avg-|-Avg-|-Max-|-Avg
--|Dist-|-Time--|-Pace--|SPM-|-HR--|-HR--|-DPS
--|12728|71:56.0|02:49.6|22.6|145.0|174.0|07.8
W-|07501|32:51.0|02:11.4|27.0|162.2|174.0|08.5
R-|06530|46:46.0|03:34.9|16.5|113.6|174.0|08.1
Workout Details
#-|SDist|-Split-|-SPace-|SPM-|AvgHR|MaxHR|DPS-
02|01501|06:31.8|02:10.5|25.8|155.5|163.0|08.9
03|01501|06:34.7|02:11.5|27.6|161.6|168.0|08.3
04|01499|06:32.3|02:10.9|26.6|161.8|171.0|08.6
05|01502|06:40.9|02:13.5|27.6|166.6|173.0|08.1
06|01499|06:31.3|02:10.6|27.5|165.2|174.0|08.3

Speedcoach Data.  I sure do like the lower noise you get from the impeller.  I think the cal factor is still a little stingy.  The avg pace from GPS was 2:11.4.  From the Speedcoach it’s 2:12.3.

Start_|_Dist_|_Split_|_Pace_|_Strks__|_Rate_|_DPS_|_AvgHR_|_Remarks
00020_|_1230_|_07:16_|_2:57.2_|_124___|_17.1_|_09.9_|_117___|_warmup
01235_|_1490_|_06:36_|_2:13.0_|_170___|_25.7_|_08.8_|_155___|_rep #1
02735_|_0546_|_03:39_|_3:20.3_|_063___|_17.3_|_08.7_|_125___|_rest
03271_|_1491_|_06:32_|_2:11.3_|_180___|_27.6_|_08.3_|_162___|_rep #2
04771_|_0604_|_04:15_|_3:31.0_|_071___|_16.7_|_08.5_|_128___|_rest
05366_|_1495_|_06:39_|_2:13.3_|_175___|_26.3_|_08.5_|_164___|_rep #3
06866_|_0421_|_03:07_|_3:42.0_|_052___|_16.7_|_08.1_|_133___|_rest
07282_|_1487_|_06:33_|_2:12.1_|_180___|_27.5_|_08.3_|_166___|_rep #4
08782_|_0473_|_03:15_|_3:26.4_|_056___|_17.2_|_08.4_|_139___|_rest
09242_|_1491_|_06:33_|_2:11.9_|_180___|_27.5_|_08.3_|_165___|_rep #5
10742_|_2876_|_17:04_|_2:58.0_|_310___|_18.2_|_09.3_|_132___|_sbr, cool down

Dist__|_Time__|_Pace___|_Strks_|_SPM__|_DPS__|_AvgHR_|_Remarks
01230_|_07:16_|_2:57.2_|_124___|_17.1_|_09.9_|_117___|_warmup
07454_|_32:53_|_2:12.3_|_885___|_26.9_|_08.4_|_162___|_Main set
02044_|_14:16_|_3:29.3_|_242___|_17.0_|_08.4_|_131___|_rest meters
02876_|_17:04_|_2:58.0_|_310___|_18.2_|_09.3_|_132___|_cool down
13604_|_11:28_|_2:37.6_|_1561___|_21.8_|_08.7_|_144___|_Total

I was delighted with this workout.  I was working hard, but I was never on the edge of failure.  I sifted through my journal and found that I did this workout on November 3rd of last year.  (Link)

That session last year was a bit of a miracle.  Everything went perfectly and I pushed it to the limit.  I managed an average split of 2:09.7.  Avg heart rate was 168.  Today, my avg pace was 2:11.4 (1.5 sec slower), but my avg heart rate was 162.  Taking into account the lack of threshold work that I have done in my single this year, I find it very encouraging that I am that close on pace, and in a better place in terms of aerobic fitness.

Tomorrow:  75′ steady state.  It’s gonna be cold again.  Predicted low around 32F.

HOCR 2016

The weather reports were ominous.  Rain and wind starting around 11am.  What time was our race…11:07am.  Before that, the water was flat, the winds were calm and the skies were cloudy but not dark.  As the morning wore on, the weather reports seemed to be improving and even when we launched around 10:20, it was still quite nice.

We headed down to the warmup area in the basin and started going around the “box”.  This is a big area marked by 6 huge yellow and black checkered buoys.  We did a couple laps and still had some time so we embarked on a third trip around.  By now it was about 10:50.  We turned the corner and started to row up to area where we were being lined up.  Even numbers on the cambridge side, odd numbers on the Boston side.  We looked up river and what did we see?  A wall of rain charging toward us.  I am serious.  You could actually see the line between where it was raining and not raining coming across the water as it approached.  And then we were in it.  The rain was not all that hard, but the wind picked up from the NW and it was pretty significant.  It was blowing steadily between 10 and 15 mph with gusts up to about 20mph.

screen-shot-2016-10-22-at-6-33-07-pm

We sat in the rain and wind, trying to hold our position between bow # 43 and #47.  Precisely at 11:07, they started the first boat and the odd and even line began to slowly paddle up.  Before I knew what was happening, I saw the red and green flags in the chute that are a couple of strokes away from the start and then I heard the announcer struggling to pronounce Lake Quinsigamond Community Rowing and say we were on the course.

Here are links for the stern video of the race:

HOCR – Part 1

HOCR – Part 2

The video tells the story.  We hacked our way through the head wind to the BU bridge.  Steering through this bridge is a challenge under ideal conditions.  With a nasty head wind blowing rain in your eyes and with multiple boats ahead of you, it is even tougher.  Joe picked a great line and we zipped right through.

Then we were into the Magazine Beach turn.  Here we were exposed to the head wind across a wider part of the river.  The goal is to get tight to the green buoys along the cambridge shore and try to get into a good rhythm through the turn.  This was complicated for us by a slower boat in front of us and a faster boats right behind us.  Joe did his best to avoid the boat that was passing us to the inside, while not running into the boat ahead of us.  On the video, it looks like they kind of zigged and zagged a bit across us as they tried to figure out how to get out of our way.

The boat that passed us looked like it was going a thousand miles an hour and that kind of got under my skin.  I started to have irrational fears of ending up in last place.  This was certainly spurred me to dig deep, both figuratively and literally.  Figuratively, I pushed up the stroke pressure and rate to an unsustainable level.  Literally, I started to row pretty badly, burying my blades too deeply and not being careful with my finishes.  This did not do our boat speed any favors.

We got into the power house stretch and the water was smooth and the wind was blocked.  It felt like the boat was moving better here.  I hardly noticed, but we passed another boat at the beginning of the stretch.  I think it was because I was too focused on a couple of boats that were gaining on us fast and passing us after we emerged from the Western Avenue bridge.

We took twenty strokes and then turned for the Weeks Foot Bridge.  My wife, sone and some friends were there cheering us on.  Honestly, because of the boats that passed us, I was pretty despondent at that point.  I had pushed way too hard, and I wasn’t even sure if I’d make it to the end.  Strangely enough, once we had passed them, I started to feel a little bit better.  I eased up a bit on the rate and we made the turn to the Anderson Bridge.  Coming out of Anderson, another boat passed us, but I my attitude had improved.  I had decided to just do what I could and just not give up.  The long turn toward the Eliot bridge was uneventful, mainly because Joe steered it really well, including the really sharp end to the turn and the passage past the docks just upstream of the bridge.  Here’s a comparison of my course last year, and Joe’s this year.  (2015 is red, 2016 is yellow)

2015 vs 2016.png

Here’s the first third. You can see the steering around overtaking and slower boats on the yellow line.  I like the line that I took last year closer to Cambridge as we approached the first bridge, but I doubt it makes much difference.

Screen Shot 2016-10-23 at 7.43.35 PM.png

Here’s the powerhouse stretch, into the weeks turn.  Joe did a better job of this than I did last year.  He was a lot smoother through the weeks turn and got us in just right place for the turn under the Anderson bridge.

screen-shot-2016-10-23-at-7-44-02-pm

Here’s the last third.  It looks like I did better job at the beginning of the curve, and Joe did better second half and he hugged Boston side into the bridge.  I hugged to cambridge shore last year, Joe swung a little wider, but again I don’t think it added much distance.

screen-shot-2016-10-23-at-7-44-40-pm

In terms of effort, this was a tough race.

I was into the threshold HR zone within a minute of the start, and I just kept pushing.  I kind of plateaued around 175/176 or most of the race, and then with about 5 minutes left, around the Anderson bridge, I started to up the rate and pushed my HR up above 95% of my HRR.  I usually count out strokes at the end of a race to give me something to focus on.  I had planned to start counting at the Anderson Bridge.  This is about 1k from the end so, about 120 strokes.  But I forgot about it with the steering that was going on.  I remembered as we went into the long turn, and I figured that we must have gone at least 60 strokes by then.  So I started counting and I figured I’d need to count up to about 60.  I was wrong.  I got to 50 and there was no sign of the finish line.  I counted another 10, still no finish line.  I wasn’t sure if I had another ten strokes in me, but I did and that set brought us just across the line.  Luckily there was a big gap between us and the next boat to finish because I needed a few seconds to put myself back together.

With the headwind, and extra river flow, it was a slow race.  The winner was a full minute off the course record for this age group event.  And the winner was the crew that set the record!  We were a good four minutes slower than the winner.  We finished in 43rd out of 52 boats.  So, my fears were not realized.

When you talk to some of the folks that we compete with, you realize that there is some genuine athletic talent in the event.  Guys that were former national team members and varsity level college rowers are common.  This seems different from running and biking where there are a lot of more casual competitors.  We were talking to one guy in our race who set the world age group record for the marathon on the erg 20 years ago.  He held a 1:47 split for whole thing!

In any case, unless you are talented and dedicated enough to win a big event like this, all you can do is try to improve.  Now I have an initial marker that I can try to make better over time.  Looking at the results, there are improvements in many areas that could help.

  • Weight:  I should lose 20 pounds
  • Strength:  I’ve been reading more about strength training for 50+ year olds.  I think I need to add this in over the winter and see if it helps
  • Fitness:  I think this is pretty good, and the best way to get better is a lot more duration at
  • Technique:  Lot’s to do here once it is next spring.  I need to improve my stroke in a couple of essential ways.  I need to fix my tendency to row “over a barrel”.  I also need to clean up my finishes and get my hands away faster.
  • Steering:  The key to this is to get enough time on the course, so next year I think doing weekly sessions on the Charles is going to be a big priority.

Friday: Practice run for the HOCR

Around 2:30pm, I met Joe down at the Singles and Doubles Launch Area (SADL) by Riverside Boat Club.

He had already unloaded the boat and gotten rigged, so we were ready to launch and go for our practice run.  Practice day for the HOCR is almost as fun as the race.  There are hundreds of boats on the course, all trying to rehearse hat they will do and trying to get landmarks to look at for steering.  The weather was great.  Wind from the ESE about 5-10 mph, and really warm, nearly 70 degrees.

ESE is a nice tail wind.  The SADL dock is about 1000m from the start.  So on practice day, you launch and join the parade of boats going upstream on the cambridge side of the river.  You do the 3700m from there to the finish, and then turn around for the long slow paddle back down river.  The paddle back is quite relaxing, or maddening if you are on a tight schedule.  The downstream course is very narrow around the turns and they closely control the traffic into them.  You are marshalled by officials on the banks to tell you when to stop and go.  You continue past the SADL dock all the way to the start area in the Charles River Basin, and then you can do a practice run from the holding area through the start chute and the first 1000m of the course which is a long turn to starboard.

Today, my phone ran out of batteries as we were paddling back down stream, so the map just shows the trip upstream and a little bit of the paddle back.

Screen Shot 2016-10-23 at 6.39.00 PM.png

The intent of this row is just to get accustomed to the course.  Last year, I got too excited and rowed it way to hard.  This year, I was determined to do a better job of keeping it light and easy.  Of course, I failed.  I went just as hard as I did last year.

Oh well.  It was a very enjoyable row and I felt a lot more energized than tired after we finished.

Thursday: 2×500 taper.

On the charles in my fluid.

Last taper day.

2×500

Workout Summary - media/20161020-152810-77630o.csv
--|Total|-Total-|--Avg--|Avg-|-Avg-|-Max-|-Avg
--|Dist-|-Time--|-Pace--|SPM-|-HR--|-HR--|-DPS
--|04143|24:30.0|02:57.5|21.1|141.4|175.0|08.0
W-|01000|03:55.0|01:57.5|29.5|161.7|174.0|08.6
R-|07344|46:00.0|03:08.0|02.4|016.4|174.0|08.0
Workout Details
#-|SDist|-Split-|-SPace-|SPM-|AvgHR|MaxHR|DPS-
02|00500|01:55.2|01:55.2|30.2|161.5|174.0|08.6
03|00500|01:59.9|01:59.9|28.9|161.8|174.0|08.7

 

Tuesday: 4 x 500 taper

In my single, down in Newton.  First day of the taper for the HOCR.

Following the same taper plan I always do.  (The paper it’s based on is here)

The idea is to do a decreasing number of high intensity intervals as you approach race day.   By doing this you maintain your VO2max while also lightening the training load to get some supercompensation.  If you compare the approach with pure rest, and a low intensity taper, you get a longer time to fatigue.

screen-shot-2015-09-30-at-9-26-01-am

So, today was 4 intervals.  Tomorrow is 3, Thursday is 2.  Friday should be a total rest day, but we will be doing a slow scouting run on the race course.

Weather:  Dark!  I boated at 6:30 and it was overcast so the full moon was blocked.  There was very little light at first, but it got better over the first 30 minutes.  There was a bit of wind at first, but it died down during my warmup.  It was unseasonably warm, around 62F.

Plan:

  • Full Rojabo style warmup
  • 4 x 500m intervals
  • As much rest as I wanted, 2 to 5 minutes
  • Pace target 2:00 (I was stunned to see that I did these with a 1:55 pace target in July)
  • Rate: 28 spm

screen-shot-2016-10-18-at-6-02-07-pm

My warmup was my version of the Rojabo warmup.  I like it because it fits the length of the river really well and is just taxing enough.

  • 10 strokes at 20spm / 10 paddle
  • 20 strokes at 22 / 20 paddle
  • 30 @ 24 / 30 paddle
  • 20 @ 26 / 20 paddle
  • 20 @ 28 / 20 paddle
  • 20 @ 30 / 20 paddle
  • 20 @ 32 / 20 paddle

Then I had a drink and did the first interval, which took me to the bridge.  I paddled through the bridge and felt pretty good, so I took off on the second one with only a couple minutes of rest.  That one hurt a bit more, and I had a taste of the lactate rush after I finished it (nausea, feeling like I would pee my pants, stuff like that).  I paddled through the s-curve, and then setup for the third interval.  I took this one a bit easier and felt few ill effects afterwards.  This one took me past the island and left me a bit too close to the end to keep going straight, so I paddled back to the end of the straight 1k chunk and set up.  My legs felt it in the last one.  But it was the last one.

I used both RIM and my speedcoach.  I’m seeing some weird stuff on the speedcoach.

Here’s the RIM data.

Here are the splits.

Workout Summary - media/20161018-175618-77540o.csv
--|Total|-Total-|--Avg--|Avg-|-Avg-|-Max-|-Avg
--|Dist-|-Time--|-Pace--|SPM-|-HR--|-HR--|-DPS
--|05474|32:45.0|02:59.5|21.4|139.9|174.0|07.8
W-|02000|09:02.0|02:15.7|25.0|147.7|173.0|07.9
R-|07672|49:50.0|03:14.9|20.4|137.4|173.0|08.3
Workout Details
#-|SDist|-Split-|-SPace-|SPM-|AvgHR|MaxHR|DPS-
02|00500|01:59.9|01:59.9|27.8|158.7|169.0|09.0
03|00500|02:01.6|02:01.6|28.0|158.1|173.0|08.8
04|00500|02:00.7|02:00.7|28.1|158.1|173.0|08.8
05|00500|01:59.8|01:59.8|28.7|160.4|173.0|08.7

Here’s the plots from the speedcoach.

I am struggling to explain the pace changes that occur in the first and second intervals.  Parsing this data into splits shows that the first rep was a bit slower on the speedcoach.  The other ones line up reasonably well.

Start_|_Dist_|_Split_|_Pace_|_Strks__|_Rate_|_DPS_|_AvgHR_|_Remarks

00020_|_0078_|_00:23_|_2:27.4_|_008___|_20.9_|_09.8_|_124___|_warmup

00100_|_0499_|_02:03_|_2:03.2_|_058___|_28.3_|_08.6_|_162___|_rep #1

00600_|_0274_|_02:00_|_3:38.6_|_037___|_18.5_|_07.4_|_142___|_rest

00860_|_0499_|_02:00_|_2:00.6_|_058___|_28.9_|_08.6_|_165___|_rep #2

01360_|_0449_|_03:07_|_3:27.9_|_059___|_19.0_|_07.6_|_135___|_rest

01820_|_0485_|_01:57_|_2:00.2_|_056___|_28.8_|_08.7_|_164___|_rep #3

02320_|_0803_|_05:12_|_3:14.2_|_095___|_18.3_|_08.5_|_129___|_rest

03100_|_0396_|_01:35_|_1:59.7_|_046___|_29.1_|_08.6_|_166___|_rep #4

03500_|_1727_|_10:04_|_2:54.8_|_188___|_18.7_|_09.2_|_132___|_cool down

The best thing about a taper is that it’s fun to row fast!

Tomorrow:  Back on Quinsig for 3 x 500 plus drills.

 

Monday: 4 x ( 5 x 2′ / 30″ rest) / 3′ rest in 2x

Weather:  Incredible.  Very little wind.  Flat water.  Temperature above 60F!!!!  A full moon out, so visibility was great even though the sun didn’t come up until we were done.

Plan:

  • warm up to north end of lake.  A couple of power 10s and a power 20.
  • 4 sets of (5 x 2′ on / 30″ paddle)
  • Each set done as a ladder 24/26/28/26/24
  • 2 to 3 minutes of rest between sets
  • cool down back to boat house

Screen Shot 2016-10-17 at 4.05.17 PM.png

| Tstart_ | Dist_ | Time_ | _Pace_ | SPM_ | avgHR | _DPS___ | Remarks
| 00:00.0 | 02417 | 14:29 | 2:59.8 | 18.4 | 124.3 | 09.1 | warming up
| 14:29.0 | 00453 | 02:00 | 2:12.5 | 24.2 | 148.7 | 09.3 |
| 16:29.0 | 00094 | 00:30 | 2:39.6 | 22.6 | 155.8 | 08.3 |
| 16:59.0 | 00462 | 02:00 | 2:09.9 | 26.5 | 159.4 | 08.7 |
| 18:59.0 | 00093 | 00:30 | 2:41.3 | 23.5 | 159.5 | 07.9 |
| 19:29.0 | 00459 | 02:00 | 2:10.7 | 27.7 | 161.0 | 08.3 |
| 21:29.0 | 00083 | 00:30 | 3:00.7 | 22.1 | 160.6 | 07.5 |
| 21:59.0 | 00441 | 02:00 | 2:16.1 | 26.2 | 158.3 | 08.4 |
| 23:59.0 | 00087 | 00:30 | 2:52.4 | 22.9 | 159.6 | 07.6 |
| 24:29.0 | 00444 | 02:00 | 2:15.1 | 24.4 | 158.2 | 09.1 |
| 26:29.0 | 00175 | 02:00 | 5:42.9 | 15.6 | 125.6 | 05.6 |
| 28:29.0 | 00450 | 02:01 | 2:14.4 | 24.4 | 147.4 | 09.1 |
| 30:30.0 | 00084 | 00:29 | 2:52.6 | 22.9 | 155.8 | 07.6 |
| 30:59.0 | 00449 | 02:00 | 2:13.6 | 26.4 | 158.7 | 08.5 |
| 32:59.0 | 00087 | 00:30 | 2:52.4 | 23.2 | 162.3 | 07.5 |
| 33:29.0 | 00462 | 02:00 | 2:09.9 | 27.9 | 162.8 | 08.3 |
| 35:29.0 | 00083 | 00:30 | 3:00.7 | 23.5 | 164.9 | 07.1 |
| 35:59.0 | 00448 | 02:00 | 2:13.9 | 26.1 | 164.1 | 08.6 |
| 37:59.0 | 00083 | 00:30 | 3:00.7 | 23.7 | 164.8 | 07.0 |
| 38:29.0 | 00439 | 02:00 | 2:16.7 | 24.7 | 162.3 | 08.9 |
| 40:29.0 | 00359 | 04:00 | 5:34.3 | 15.1 | 119.7 | 05.9 |
| 44:29.0 | 00451 | 02:00 | 2:13.0 | 24.5 | 143.9 | 09.2 |
| 46:29.0 | 00085 | 00:30 | 2:56.5 | 23.1 | 153.8 | 07.4 |
| 46:59.0 | 00452 | 02:00 | 2:12.7 | 26.7 | 157.0 | 08.5 |
| 48:59.0 | 00085 | 00:30 | 2:56.5 | 24.5 | 161.0 | 06.9 |
| 49:29.0 | 00461 | 02:00 | 2:10.2 | 28.5 | 161.9 | 08.1 |
| 51:29.0 | 00083 | 00:30 | 3:00.7 | 24.4 | 164.9 | 06.8 |
| 51:59.0 | 00442 | 02:00 | 2:15.7 | 26.6 | 161.3 | 08.3 |
| 53:59.0 | 00085 | 00:30 | 2:56.5 | 24.0 | 161.8 | 07.1 |
| 54:29.0 | 00457 | 02:00 | 2:11.3 | 24.8 | 162.1 | 09.2 |
| 56:29.0 | 00258 | 03:00 | 5:48.8 | 23.9 | 128.0 | 03.6 |
| 59:29.0 | 00438 | 02:00 | 2:17.0 | 26.3 | 147.0 | 08.3 |
| 01:29.0 | 00095 | 00:30 | 2:37.9 | 24.5 | 156.2 | 07.8 |
| 01:59.0 | 00471 | 02:00 | 2:07.4 | 28.4 | 161.5 | 08.3 |
| 03:59.0 | 00084 | 00:30 | 2:58.6 | 25.1 | 165.1 | 06.7 |
| 04:29.0 | 00465 | 02:00 | 2:09.0 | 30.1 | 165.7 | 07.7 |
| 06:29.0 | 00082 | 00:30 | 3:02.9 | 22.9 | 168.0 | 07.2 |
| 06:59.0 | 00454 | 02:00 | 2:12.2 | 28.0 | 165.6 | 08.1 |
| 08:59.0 | 00077 | 00:30 | 3:14.8 | 24.2 | 168.2 | 06.4 |
| 09:29.0 | 00448 | 02:00 | 2:13.9 | 26.5 | 165.5 | 08.5 |
| 11:29.0 | 01353 | 09:48 | 3:37.3 | 19.4 | 128.1 | 07.1 |

| Tstart_ | Dist_ | Time_ | _Pace_ | SPM_ | avgHR | _DPS___ | Remarks
| 00:00.0 | 02417 | 14:29 | 2:59.8 | 18.4 | 124.3 | 09.1 | warmup
| 00:00.0 | 02162 | 16:59 | 3:55.7 | 20.7 | 141.5 | 06.2 | rests
| 00:00.0 | 01353 | 09:48 | 3:37.3 | 19.4 | 128.1 | 07.1 | cool down
| 00:00.0 | 02694 | 12:01 | 2:13.8 | 24.5 | 153.8 | 09.2 | r24
| 00:00.0 | 03580 | 16:00 | 2:14.1 | 26.4 | 158.9 | 08.5 | r26
| 00:00.0 | 02307 | 10:00 | 2:10.0 | 28.1 | 162.6 | 08.2 | r28
| 00:00.0 | 00465 | 02:00 | 2:09.0 | 30.1 | 165.7 | 07.7 | r30

That was exhausting, but pretty darn fun.  HR was notably low for the RPE of the workout.  I guess I was never really on the edge.  And the boat speed was better.  We’ve done this workout twice before.  The first time our avg pace was 2:14.1.  The second time it was windier and the avg pace was 2:15.5.  Today, on very nice water, and with a lower HR, the avg pace was 2:12.7.  Gotta say, I’m pretty happy with that.

It’s interesting how we were faster at r24 than we were at r26.  Part of that is that the r24s were the first and last rep of each set, so we were fresher in the first and more motivated in the last, but I also think that we are just cleaner at r24.  I think for racing we should probably be working between  these two rates.

Tomorrow:  Back in my single for a taper session 4 x 500 at r28.  With long rests and some technique drills.