Monday: 3 x 20’/1′ rest

Plan:

  1.  3 x 20′ / 1′ rest
  2. slow start, 5′ at 150W, 5′ at 175W, then 190W the rest of the way.
  3. rate:  22 (on slides)

Screen Shot 2015-11-16 at 9.24.16 AM

11-16

Tired legs from yesterday’s exhertions.  Also a warmer room and wearing a shirt meant that I was a lot sweatier, and my HR was higher.  I pulled the power down by 3 watts, and the lactates were 0.2 lower than Saturday, despite the higher RPE and HR.

lac table

This is a base building / transition week, so I’ll be sticking to endurance sessions.  Tomorrow is 4 x 20’/1′.  The plan calls for an afternoon session (30′ UT2), but I’m not sure if I can fit it in around work commitments.

Sunday: 6K test

Right before I went to go do this test, I read Sander’s post about how he might have had a PB if he went out less conservatively and had a “Contempt of Death”.  I was very uncertain about what I could do today.  On one hand, I haven’t done a lot of work on the erg, and I was pretty far away from PB pace on my 2K test.  On the other hand, I’ve been working this distance all autumn.

So, I decided to set up three pace boats on RowPro.

  • One at 1:50, which was the slowest I really wanted to go
  • One at 1:49, which was about my PB pace from last season
  • One at 1:48, which was just a bit slower than what I thought was my PB Pace (1:47.9).  In fact, I had misread my PB from my signature.  Checking it now, I found out that it was in fact a 21:23, not 21:32 (1:46.9).  A bummer, as it turns out.

I started with a 2K warmup with 3 bursts at 1:45 to 1:50.

Screen Shot 2015-11-15 at 5.26.00 PM

Workout Summary – Nov 15, 2015
–_|_Total_|_-Total-_|_–Avg–_|_-Avg-_|_Avg-_|_-Avg-_|_–Avg–_|_-Avg_|_-Avg
–_|_Dist-_|_-Time–_|_-Pace–_|_Watts_|_SPM-_|_-HR–_|_-%HRR–_|_-DPS_|_-SPI
–_|_02000_|_08:07.3_|_02:01.8_|_193.6_|_19.7_|_125.7_|_ 58.0% _|_12.5_|_09.8

Then in to the main event.  With Sander’s words ringing in my head, I went out to see if I could hold 1:48.  I felt pretty good through 1000.  By the time I got to 2000, it was starting to hurt, but my HR was nice an low.  I was just counting out each 1000m.  It was generally about 95 to 98 strokes per 1000.  It wasn’t very dramatic, but it was pretty nasty going with 2000 to go, and I eased up just a little bit for a few strokes.  With 1000 left, I knew I was going to make it and started to push a bit more.  In the end, I finished with a 1:47.5 and a 21:29.9.  Not the PB  that I thought it was at the time, but still a hell of a row.

Thanks to Sander and the Contempt of Death.

Screen Shot 2015-11-15 at 5.29.16 PM Screen Shot 2015-11-15 at 5.28.59 PM

Workout Summary – Nov 15, 2015
–_|_Total_|_-Total-_|_–Avg–_|_-Avg-_|_Avg-_|_-Avg-_|_–Avg–_|_-Avg_|_-Avg
–_|_Dist-_|_-Time–_|_-Pace–_|_Watts_|_SPM-_|_-HR–_|_-%HRR–_|_-DPS_|_-SPI
–_|_06000_|_21:29.9_|_01:47.5_|_281.8_|_26.7_|_170.1_|_ 89.4% _|_10.5_|_10.6
Workout Details
#-_|_SDist_|_-Split-_|_-SPace-_|_Watts_|_SPM-_|_AvgHR_|_Avg%HRR_|_DPS-_|_-SPI

01_|_00500_|_01:48.7_|_01:48.7_|_272.6_|_24.8_|_137.4_|_ 66.2% _|_11.1_|_11.0
02_|_00500_|_01:47.4_|_01:47.4_|_282.2_|_26.2_|_157.4_|_ 80.4% _|_10.6_|_10.8
03_|_00500_|_01:46.9_|_01:46.9_|_286.9_|_26.4_|_164.4_|_ 85.4% _|_10.6_|_10.9
04_|_00500_|_01:47.3_|_01:47.3_|_283.7_|_26.3_|_168.3_|_ 88.1% _|_10.6_|_10.8
05_|_00500_|_01:47.6_|_01:47.6_|_281.1_|_26.2_|_170.2_|_ 89.5% _|_10.6_|_10.7
06_|_00500_|_01:47.7_|_01:47.7_|_280.2_|_26.2_|_172.2_|_ 90.9% _|_10.6_|_10.7
07_|_00500_|_01:47.7_|_01:47.7_|_280.3_|_26.7_|_174.5_|_ 92.5% _|_10.4_|_10.5
08_|_00500_|_01:48.1_|_01:48.1_|_277.2_|_26.6_|_176.3_|_ 93.9% _|_10.4_|_10.4
09_|_00500_|_01:47.8_|_01:47.8_|_279.3_|_26.7_|_177.9_|_ 95.0% _|_10.4_|_10.5
10_|_00500_|_01:47.9_|_01:47.9_|_278.3_|_27.2_|_178.8_|_ 95.6% _|_10.2_|_10.2
11_|_00500_|_01:47.8_|_01:47.8_|_279.5_|_27.8_|_179.9_|_ 96.4% _|_10.0_|_10.0
12_|_00500_|_01:45.1_|_01:45.1_|_301.2_|_28.5_|_180.9_|_ 97.1% _|_10.0_|_10.6

I did a lactate test 4 minutes after finishing, just for fun.  13.6mmol/l

Then I did long “happy ending” cool down.

Screen Shot 2015-11-15 at 5.31.10 PM

Workout Summary – Nov 15, 2015
–_|_Total_|_-Total-_|_–Avg–_|_-Avg-_|_Avg-_|_-Avg-_|_–Avg–_|_-Avg_|_-Avg
–_|_Dist-_|_-Time–_|_-Pace–_|_Watts_|_SPM-_|_-HR–_|_-%HRR–_|_-DPS_|_-SPI
–_|_05000_|_21:24.1_|_02:08.4_|_165.3_|_19.1_|_146.8_|_ 72.9% _|_12.3_|_08.7

Tonight, I drink my SB Beer.  Tomorrow is supposed to be a rest day, but I think I will do a light endurance session instead.

Saturday: 3 x 20′ / 1′ – lacates don’t lie (or do they?)

During “test week”, I am doing 3 x 20′ steady state on the off days.  I’m trying to home in on the right training power and also do something that I think will be easy to keep up with in future test weeks.

Today, it was chilly outside, so with open windows, it was quite cool, maybe mid-50s, and it was quite breezy, so I had a lot of air flow.  I’ve noticed a very strong correlation between HR and temperature, so I expected my HR to stay low and it did.  It also felt incredibly easy.  I had intended to back off from 193W to 190W for todays session, but it just felt so incredibly easy, I couldn’t do it.  I stuck with 193W.

As usual, I did the slow start.  I’m more convinced every day that this makes a big difference

Screen Shot 2015-11-14 at 6.38.53 PM Screen Shot 2015-11-14 at 6.38.37 PM

Workout Summary – Nov 14, 2015
–_|_Total_|_-Total-_|_–Avg–_|_-Avg-_|_Avg-_|_-Avg-_|_–Avg–_|_-Avg_|_-Avg
–_|_Dist-_|_-Time–_|_-Pace–_|_Watts_|_SPM-_|_-HR–_|_-%HRR–_|_-DPS_|_-SPI
–_|_14589_|_60:00.0_|_02:03.4_|_186.3_|_18.9_|_130.6_|_ 61.4% _|_12.9_|_09.9
Workout Details
#-_|_SDist_|_-Split-_|_-SPace-_|_Watts_|_SPM-_|_AvgHR_|_Avg%HRR_|_DPS-_|_-SPI

01_|_04745_|_20:00.0_|_02:06.4_|_173.1_|_17.9_|_122.7_|_ 55.8% _|_13.3_|_09.7
02_|_04919_|_20:00.0_|_02:02.0_|_192.9_|_19.4_|_132.8_|_ 63.0% _|_12.7_|_09.9
03_|_04924_|_20:00.0_|_02:01.8_|_193.5_|_19.4_|_135.7_|_ 65.0% _|_12.7_|_10.0

But lactates don’t lie.  When I used this power on Thursday, I tested at 3.0mmol/l.  Today, with my HR so low and a low RPE to match, I expected to test out well below 2.0, but that is not what happened.  I tested out at 2.5mmol/l.

That’s a bit better than Thursday’s reading, but still above target.  It just goes to show you how variable HR is as a guide for steady state training.  If I was using HR as a guide, I would have pushed the pace much harder and my lactates would have probably been above 5.0 by the end.

There is a little nagging doubt in the back of mind that maybe this test was wrong.  Maybe I contaminated it with a bit of sweat.  But I’m pretty careful, and it isn’t that far off.  I only have to be a little bit above target to start to accumulate lactate and over 60 minutes, the difference between 2.0 and 2.5 is very small.

So, I have to earn the right to train at 193W.  I have to back off and get 3 tests below 2.0 before I push the pace up.

Here are my 60′ lactates

lc 11-14

Later today I’ll be doing my 6K test.  Target is sub 1:50 pace.  SB last year was 1:49 pace.  PB is 1:47.6 pace.  I think a PB is out of reach, but if today is a good day, I might be able to match last season.  I need to remember that this is just a marker for the beginning of winter training.

CRASH-B Training Plan

Objective:  Row a 6:34 2K at the CRASH-B sprints on February 28, 2016

Plan Principles:  The plan is based on principles from The Science Of Winning, by Jan Olbrecht, and a lecture by Stephen Seiler.

  1. The plan is based on a 80/20 training volume split between endurance training and High Intensity Training (HIT).  This translates into 3 HIT sessions per week and 3 longer endurance sessions, plus second endurance sessions as schedule and time permits.
  2. Endurance training is defined as training at or below 2.0 mmol/l lactate.  This will be measured at least once a week after 60 minutes of endurance rowing.  In general this will be steady state rowing between 18 and 22 SPM, but low intensity Wolverine sessions, fartlek sessions, and other variations will be used to try to keep it from getting too boring.
  3. The three and a half month training period prior to the Crash-Bs will be divided up into 3 major mesocycles.
    1. Mesocycle 1 will focus on hard distance rowing.  The three HIT sessions per week will be basically time trial format with total rowing time between 60 and 80 minutes.  Target initial power will be 95% of LT power.  Basically, a few seconds off current best time for the distances prescribed.  These are very much like Wolverine Plan L3 sessions.
    2. Mesocycle 2 will focus on long intervals.  The three HIT sessions per week will have different long interval format workouts for a total rowing time between 30 and 40 minutes.  Roughly 5 minute rests.  Initial target power will be 105% of LT power.  These are basically Wolverine L2 sessions.
    3. Mesocycle 3 will focus on short sprint and peak power training.  The short sprints are at 115% of LT power for a total rowing time of 12 to 20 minutes.  Nice long rests.These are basically L1 sessions.  The peak power training will be tacked onto the end of shortened endurance sessions twice a week.  These will follow the format described here.  Basically a series of very short, very intense sprints.
  4. I will try to do a time trial, or enter a smaller erg race about a month prior to the CRASH-Bs.  I’ll do a short taper for that.
  5. The week before the CRASH-Bs, I will do a longer taper.
  6. After the CRASH-Bs, I will repeat the fitness test battery that I’m doing now.
  7. I will track lactate for endurance rows and HR on all pieces, but focus on incremental improvement to power for the training pieces during each of the blocks.

Of course this will change based on travel and life, but this is the basic template.

Month Day Date Mesocycle AM Workout PM Workout
November M 11/16/15 Base building Rest day
T 11/17/15 4 x 20′ UT2 / UT1 30′ UT2
W 11/18/15 4 x 20′ UT2 / UT1
T 11/19/15 4 x 20′ UT2 / UT1 30′ UT2
F 11/20/15 4 x 20′ UT2 / UT1
S 11/21/15 4 x 20′ UT2 / UT1 30′ UT2
S 11/22/15 4 x 20′ UT2 / UT1
M 11/23/15 Hard Distance
95% LT Power
Rest day
T 11/24/15 4 x 15’/2′ 30′ UT2
W 11/25/15 4 x 20’/1′
T 11/26/15 60′ 30′ UT2
F 11/27/15 4 x 20’/1′
S 11/28/15 HM 30′ UT2
S 11/29/15 4 x 20’/1′
M 11/30/15 Rest day
December T 12/1/15 4 x 5K / 2′ 30′ UT2
W 12/2/15 4 x 20’/1′
T 12/3/15 2 x 30′ / 5′ 30′ UT2
F 12/4/15 4 x 20’/1′
S 12/5/15 HM 30′ UT2
S 12/6/15 4 x 20’/1′
M 12/7/15 Rest day
T 12/8/15 15 x 3′ / 1′ 30′ UT2
W 12/9/15 4 x 20’/1′
T 12/10/15 10K 30′ UT2
F 12/11/15 4 x 20’/1′
S 12/12/15 HM 30′ UT2
S 12/13/15 4 x 20’/1′
M 12/14/15 Rest day
T 12/15/15 30′ 30′ UT2
W 12/16/15 4 x 20’/1′
T 12/17/15 60′ 30′ UT2
F 12/18/15 4 x 20’/1′
S 12/19/15 HM 30′ UT2
S 12/20/15 4 x 20’/1′
M 12/21/15 Long Intervals
105% LT Power
Rest day
T 12/22/15 Waterfall 30′ UT2
W 12/23/15 4 x 20’/1′
T 12/24/15 4 x 2K 30′ UT2
F 12/25/15 4 x 20’/1′
S 12/26/15 5 x 1500 30′ UT2
S 12/27/15 4 x 20’/1′
M 12/28/15 Rest day
T 12/29/15 3 x 10′ 30′ UT2
W 12/30/15 4 x 20’/1′
T 12/31/15 4 x 8′ 30′ UT2
January F 1/1/16 4 x 20’/1′
S 1/2/16 5 x 6′ 30′ UT2
S 1/3/16 4 x 20’/1′
M 1/4/16 Rest day
T 1/5/16 Waterfall 30′ UT2
W 1/6/16 4 x 20’/1′
T 1/7/16 4 x 2K 30′ UT2
F 1/8/16 4 x 20’/1′
S 1/9/16 6K hard 30′ UT2
S 1/10/16 4 x 20’/1′
M 1/11/16 Rest day
T 1/12/16 3 x 10′ 30′ UT2
W 1/13/16 4 x 20’/1′
T 1/14/16 4 x 8′ 30′ UT2
F 1/15/16 4 x 20’/1′
S 1/16/16 5k hard 30′ UT2
S 1/17/16 4 x 20’/1′
M 1/18/16 Short Int / Pk Power
115% LT Power
Rest day
T 1/19/16 4 x 1000 30′ UT2
W 1/20/16 3 x 20′ / 1′ plus PP
T 1/21/16 6 x 750 30′ UT2
F 1/22/16 3 x 20′ / 1′ plus PP
S 1/23/16 8 x 500 30′ UT2
S 1/24/16 4 x 20’/1′
M 1/25/16 Rest day
T 1/26/16 4 x 1000 30′ UT2
W 1/27/16 4 x 500
T 1/28/16 3 x 500
F 1/29/16 warm up only
S 1/30/16 Likely date for Cranberry Crunch
S 1/31/16 4 x 20’/1′
February M 2/1/16 Rest day
T 2/2/16 4 x 1000 30′ UT2
W 2/3/16 3 x 20′ / 1′ plus PP
T 2/4/16 6 x 750 30′ UT2
F 2/5/16 3 x 20′ / 1′ plus PP
S 2/6/16 8 x 500 30′ UT2
S 2/7/16 4 x 20’/1′
M 2/8/16 Rest day
T 2/9/16 4 x 1000 30′ UT2
W 2/10/16 3 x 20′ / 1′ plus PP
T 2/11/16 6 x 750 30′ UT2
F 2/12/16 3 x 20′ / 1′ plus PP
S 2/13/16 8 x 500 30′ UT2
S 2/14/16 4 x 20’/1′
M 2/15/16 Rest day
T 2/16/16 4 x 1000 30′ UT2
W 2/17/16 3 x 20′ / 1′ plus PP
T 2/18/16 6 x 750
F 2/19/16 3 x 20′ / 1′ plus PP
S 2/20/16 8 x 500
S 2/21/16 3 x 20′ / 1′
M 2/22/16 Race Taper 4 x 1000
T 2/23/16 Rest day
W 2/24/16 4 x 500 / 4′
T 2/25/16 3 x 500 / 4′
F 2/26/16 2 x 500 / 4′
S 2/27/16 warm up only
S 2/28/16 Crash-B Sprints!
M 2/29/16 Test Week Rest day
March T 3/1/16 2-speed
W 3/2/16 Peak Power
T 3/3/16 3 x 20′ / 1′
F 3/4/16 2K
S 3/5/16 3 x 20′ / 1′
S 3/6/16 6K

Friday: 2K Test

Plan:

  1. On slides
  2. 20 minute warmup with power 20s at race pace
  3. 2K test
    1. Time target: 6:48
    2. Pacing: Flat pacing at 1:42
    3. Rate: 32 to 34
  4. 20 minute cool down

2k Screen Shot 2015-11-13 at 8.27.10 AM

6:50.4…Not terrible, but not as good as I could have done.  I had a little breakdown around 800 meters.  I was fully prepared for “the wave”.  When I do more speed work, I get used to the crisis moment that hits around then.  Kind of a combination pain, chills, nausea, drowning feeling that passes over the course of about 10 strokes.  Anyway, it hit me hard today and I paused before I really knew what was going on.  I started going again almost immediately and finished without any more drama.  Kind of a lame and it definitely cost me about 3 or 4 seconds off the time.

But as a marker for the start of the indoor season, it isn’t so bad.  I ranked it for fun and it’s 18 out 778 in my age group (97th %-ile).  I think with a month or so of base work, and then a couple months of sharpening, taking 3 seconds off my splits is entirely feasible.  I’d like to build a plan to be within striking distance of my 2K PB by the crash-bs.

Tomorrow:  3×20’/1′ steady state at 190W.

Thursday: 3 x 20′ / 1′ rest

More deviations from the test week plan.  As I drafted the plan, I had decided that between test days, I would do 2×20′ of steady state.  Today I changed my mind for a couple reasons.

  1. I wanted to take a lactate test at the normal 60′ minute point to check if a step up in steady power was justified.
  2. I didn’t really see the harm as long as I made it a consistent change for future test weeks
  3. I felt like rowing, dammit.

Plan:

  1. 3 x 20′ / 1′ rest
  2. Rate: <20 spm
  3. Pace:  Slow start at 2:15 for 5′, then 2:10 for 5′, then target pace thereafter (2:02)
  4. Lactate test immediately after last 20′ piece

Screen Shot 2015-11-12 at 4.25.00 PM Screen Shot 2015-11-12 at 4.24.47 PM

Workout Summary – Nov 12, 2015
–_|_Total_|_-Total-_|_–Avg–_|_-Avg-_|_Avg-_|_-Avg-_|_–Avg–_|_-Avg_|_-Avg
–_|_Dist-_|_-Time–_|_-Pace–_|_Watts_|_SPM-_|_-HR–_|_-%HRR–_|_-DPS_|_-SPI
–_|_14583_|_60:00.0_|_02:03.4_|_186.1_|_18.6_|_139.3_|_ 67.6% _|_13.1_|_10.0
Workout Details
#-_|_SDist_|_-Split-_|_-SPace-_|_Watts_|_SPM-_|_AvgHR_|_Avg%HRR_|_DPS-_|_-SPI

01_|_04741_|_20:00.0_|_02:06.6_|_172.7_|_17.8_|_124.6_|_ 57.2% _|_13.4_|_09.7
02_|_04922_|_20:00.0_|_02:01.9_|_193.2_|_19.0_|_143.0_|_ 70.2% _|_13.0_|_10.2
03_|_04920_|_20:00.0_|_02:02.0_|_192.9_|_19.1_|_149.4_|_ 74.8% _|_12.9_|_10.1

Lactate Reading after finishing was 3.0mmol/l vs target of <2.0.

11-12 lac

So, 193W is a bit too much for right now.  I will back off to 190W and monitor.  When I get 3 readings under 2.0, I’ll push again.

It’s tough for me to remember that there is little downside to going too slow, but pushing too fast reduces the effectiveness of the training.  That’s why lactate testing is such a useful  tool for me.

Tomorrow:  2K time trial.  I’d like to beat 6:50.

Wednesday: 1 Minute Power Test

So, I know that I was supposed to do a light day today, but looking at my work schedule, it didn’t look so good for a power test tomorrow.  I also felt pretty fresh.  I didn’t need to dig all that terribly deep for the 2 speed test.  Finally, thinking about the 2K test, the idea of keeping up the intensity seemed to more closely mimic the kind of taper I like to do.

The challenge was the PM on the erg.  I was doing this at work and it is a older model C with an old style PM.  The kind that you can’t hook up to rowpro.  So, I pulled my PM3 off of my erg at home with the idea of swapping it onto the erg at work for the day.  I was stymied by the fact that the mounting bracket has been changed between PM models and the new one would not fit on the old bracket.  Bummer.

So, I ended up setting my iphone on a upturned trashcan, leaning against a small dumbell and aiming at the PM.  Then I laboriously transcribed the power reading from each stroke into excel.  If you want to watch some really boring videos, I posted them to youtube.

Why are there two, you ask?  Well, there’s a story behind that.  Not much of a story, but a story nonetheless.

I did a nice gentle 20 minute warmup, and then got myself psyched up for the test.  Apparently I did not get myself psyched up nearly enough, because I blew up big time 32 seconds into the test.  I took the go all out advice to heart and I just totally lost it round the 30 second mark.  I was on slides, so I was cranking at close to 50 SPM.  I was rowing mostly with my eyes closed, and then opened them after about 25 strokes.  When I saw I had only made it halfway, I suffered a bout of acute despondency and dropped the handle.  Pity, it would have been a good test if I had the guts to keep going.  As it was, I set a new PR for peak power.  770W vs my old mark of 701W.  I also maintained with 10% of that value for 25 seconds, which shows that my “Anaerobic alactic critical duration” is reasonable.  “Rowing Faster” says you want to be able to hold that for longer than 20 seconds.  Of course for the other measures, average power and “Anaerobic lactic critical duration” were not measurable from this failed test.

I took a few minutes to get my head together and tried again.  This time, I made it less than 20 seconds into the test and I didn’t bother to transcribe the results.

I had a chat with myself, and decided to make yet another attempt, even though I knew that the test results would not be fully valid.  At least I would be able to get a completed test to score.  Maybe I’ll loop back to this in a week or so.

The last attempt was fine.  I definitely paced myself too much.  I certainly had a lot less power in the initial burst.  This one peaked at 726W.  AACD was 18 seconds.  ALCD was 60 seconds.  Average Power for the minute was 606W.  Maybe I was dogging it, but I was fairly shattered after I finished and the long 20 minute cool down was a struggle even at a 2:10 pace.

To summarize:

  • Peak Power: Target – 837W to 1023W, Actual: 770W
  • Average Power: Target – 674W to 814W, Actual: 606W

So, basically horrible compared to the benchmarks.  By the way, I don’t know too many guys my age with a low pull of 1:12.  Frankly, I don’t that many guys with a low pull of 1:12, so I am not sure how realistic these targets are.

The important thing is that it gives me something to compare against in future tests.  I will feel better if I redo the test in a week and get a complete first shot test done.

Here are my curves

power test

Here’s the HR plot for the whole disaster.

Screen Shot 2015-11-11 at 8.54.40 AM

Tomorrow:  40 minute steady state sometime during the day.  Then 2K trial on Friday.

Tuesday: 2-speed test

Test Protocol documented in yesterday’s post here

Done on my erg at home (static) with RowPro.

The 2-speed test is a 2 x 1000m with 15 minutes of rest between intervals.  The first interval is to be done roughly at LT pace, basically a 6K kind of pace.  For me right now, around 1:50 or so.  The second at V02Max pacing, basically 2K pace.  That would be around 1:42, but faster is better.  It’s supposed to be close to all out over the 1K distance.

I started with a 20 minute warmup.  I’ve been starting off more slowly lately and I like the change.  I used to do a Fletcher warmup, at the prescribed paces, but that starts at something like a 2:05 for me and then gets quite fast and frankly takes a lot of effort.  Now I start at 2:15, and then gradually pick up the pace and then do a few bursts at target pace or faster.  Then finish slowly.

Screen Shot 2015-11-10 at 11.36.38 AM Screen Shot 2015-11-10 at 11.36.25 AM

–_|_Dist-_|_-Time–_|_-Pace–_|_Watts_|_SPM-_|_-HR–_|_-%HRR–_|_-DPS_|_-SPI
–_|_04853_|_20:00.0_|_02:03.6_|_185.2_|_19.9_|_138.9_|_ 67.3% _|_12.2_|_09.3
Workout Details
#-_|_SDist_|_-Split-_|_-SPace-_|_Watts_|_SPM-_|_AvgHR_|_Avg%HRR_|_DPS-_|_-SPI

01_|_00895_|_04:00.0_|_02:14.1_|_145.3_|_17.0_|_111.9_|_ 48.1% _|_13.2_|_08.5
02_|_00930_|_04:00.0_|_02:09.0_|_163.0_|_18.5_|_124.6_|_ 57.2% _|_12.6_|_08.8
03_|_00988_|_04:00.0_|_02:01.4_|_195.6_|_19.8_|_137.1_|_ 66.0% _|_12.5_|_09.9
04_|_01584_|_06:00.0_|_01:53.7_|_238.4_|_23.7_|_159.0_|_ 81.6% _|_11.2_|_10.1
05_|_00232_|_01:00.0_|_02:09.2_|_162.1_|_17.0_|_150.4_|_ 75.4% _|_13.7_|_09.5
06_|_00224_|_01:00.0_|_02:14.2_|_144.8_|_18.0_|_138.4_|_ 66.9% _|_12.4_|_08.0

Then into the main event.  I set up Rowpro for variable intervals so that I wouldn’t have an extra 15 minute rest after my last interval.  I it up as follows

  • Variable Intervals (Distance, no rest)
  • 1000m Hard
  • 900s stop (you put the time in the distance box, don’t ask me why, but it works)
  • 1000m V. Hard

Screen Shot 2015-11-10 at 11.52.51 AM Screen Shot 2015-11-10 at 11.52.37 AM

Workout Summary – Nov 10, 2015
–_|_Total_|_-Total-_|_–Avg–_|_-Avg-_|_Avg-_|_-Avg-_|_–Avg–_|_-Avg_|_-Avg
–_|_Dist-_|_-Time–_|_-Pace–_|_Watts_|_SPM-_|_-HR–_|_-%HRR–_|_-DPS_|_-SPI
–_|_02000_|_06:58.4_|_01:44.6_|_305.8_|_27.4_|_157.2_|_ 80.3% _|_10.5_|_11.2
Workout Details
#-_|_SDist_|_-Split-_|_-SPace-_|_Watts_|_SPM-_|_AvgHR_|_Avg%HRR_|_DPS-_|_-SPI

01_|_01000_|_03:38.7_|_01:49.3_|_267.8_|_25.0_|_152.2_|_ 76.8% _|_11.0_|_10.7
02_|_01000_|_03:19.7_|_01:39.9_|_351.4_|_30.0_|_161.9_|_ 83.6% _|_10.0_|_11.7

Lactate readings were taken at 1′ and 3′ after each interval.  The readings were:

  • Post LT Interval: 1′ – 5.6mmol/l, 3′ – 4.5mmol/l
  • Post VO2Max Interval: 1′ – 10.7mmol/l, 3′ – 10.7mmol/l

This results in the following chart:

11-10 2-speed

Future tests will show changes in aerobic fitness through displacement in the x-axis.  Changes in anaerobic fitness will show in changes in the slope of the line.

After that, I did a 2K happy ending, starting at 1:50 and slowing down by 5 seconds each 250m.

Screen Shot 2015-11-10 at 12.04.15 PM

So, that’s that.  I was happy that I could hold sub-1:40 for the second 1K.  I think that bodes well for being able to do something around 1:43 or better for the 2K test.

The rest of the test week is as follows

  • Wednesday: easy day: 40′ steady state
  • Thursday: 1 minute power test, then probably the November CTC
  • Friday: easy day: 40′ steady state
  • Saturday: 2K Test
  • Sunday: Easy day: 40′ steady state
  • Monday: 6K Test

End of Season Fitness Testing

The purpose of this testing period is to determine current fitness, balance of aerobic versus anaerobic capability.  The findings will be used to set priorities for my winter training plan.

My intention is to repeat this same set of tests at the beginning of each major training period to allow me to track long term trends in fitness and witness the ravages of aging quantitatively.

There are 4 specific tests.  These tests are to be done in this specific order.  Only one test will be done in a training session.  A light day of 40 minutes of steady state rowing (<2.0mmol/l lactate power) between each test day.

  1. 2- speed lactate test
  2. Anaerobic Fitness Test
  3. 2K Test
  4. 6K Test

Detailed Descriptions

  1.  2 Speed Lactate Test.

(source:  The Science of Winning, Jan Olbrecht.  Original Source:  Mader A. and H. Heck: A theory of the metabolic origin of “anaerobic threshold”. Int. J. Sports Med. 7, 45-65, 1986)

The Science of Winning is a book about training for competitive swimming.  Since spint rowing events are similar duration to longer swimming events, a lot of the training principles are almost directly applicable.  The 2 speed test is presented as a way to assess the balance of aerobic and anaerobic capability in a swimmer by completing the same test distance twice.  After a thorough warm up, the first trial is done at a submaximal pace, and then after a long rest (15 minutes, active rest) a second time as fast as the distance can be completed.  The test can be done on different distances.  In the book, it was presented with 100m, 200m and 400m distances.  For reference, the time to swim 100m is about a minute, so rowing equivalents would be 250m, 500m, and 1000m.  I believe that I will complete the test at 1000m to align better with the longer rowing competitive distances.

After each trial, a lactate reading at 1 minute and 3 minutes post exercise.  The book recommends testing at 5 min, 7 min, etc after the last trial until the lactate level starts to fall to try to get a more accurate idea of what the peak lactate level is.  Here is the graphic from the book.

Screen Shot 2015-11-09 at 10.30.09 AM

The two readings are then plotted as power versus lactate and line drawn between the two points.

Screen Shot 2015-11-09 at 10.30.31 AM

The position of the line along the x-axis provides information about aerobic fitness.  The slope of the line can be used to understand the balance of aerobic to anaerobic power.  I do not expect to get much out of the first test beyond establishing a baseline for future testing.

The thing I like about this test is that it is not as susceptible to judgement as other tests (like the Rojabo test).  Basically, since you are measuring both power and lactate, even if there is minor variation in how hard you try, the line will still give a good idea of how your fitness has changed.

So, the specific guidelines for the test:

  1.  15′ minute warmup including 5 x 10 stroke bursts at test power
  2. Trial #1:  1000m, 6K pace (~1:50)
  3. 15′ rest:  at least 10 minutes active, with lactate tests at 1′ and 3′  (record max lactate and avg power)
  4. Trial #2: 1000m 2K pace (~1:42 ish)
  5. Cool down: 10′ with lactate tests at 1′, 3′, 5′ (record max lactate and avg power)
2. Anaerobic Power Test

(Source: Rowing Faster, 2nd Ed., Chapter 6)

This is a modified version of the Wingate test.  It’s pretty simple.  Row as hard as you can for 60 seconds.  That’s it.  The key to the test is what happens in the 60 seconds.

The instructions are:

  1.  Set the erg to maximum drag factor.
  2. Setup a way to record the power for each stroke, either take a video of the monitor to review afterward, or use rowPro.
  3. Do a 10 minute steady state warmup
  4. Set the monitor for 1 minute intervals with 1 minute rest.
  5. Paddle through the first minute and the first 50 seconds of the rest.
  6. In the last 10 seconds of the rest, crank up the power so you can hit the beginning of the test period going full blast
  7. Row as hard as you can with good form.  Rate up as much as you like, as long as you are taking full strokes.  Do not pace yourself.  The objective is to pull as many watts as you can on each stroke.
  8. As you continue through the minute, your power output will begin to fade.  This is expected and is precisely what the point of the test is.
  9. After you finish, throw up in a nearby trash can, cool down and then get working on data analysis.

If you do it right, you end up with a graph that looks like this…

Screen Shot 2015-11-09 at 1.43.38 PM

Here is what you try to get from the curve

Screen Shot 2015-11-09 at 2.12.31 PM

Here is Table 6.3

Screen Shot 2015-11-09 at 2.14.29 PM

So, for me as a heavyweight man, at 52 years of age.  The target peak power is

  • (1 – 22 * 0.3%) * 1000W = 934W (Holy smokes!  That’s a 1:12 pace.  My all time best Low Pull is 1:19.0 (710W), so I expect to fall way short of that benchmark.

As with the 2 speed test.  The main idea here is to get a baseline that I can use to compare to in the future.  Development of anaerobic power is best left to the last phase  pre-competition, unless there is a lot of strength training to be done.  So, I would likely rerun this test about a month prior to competition and then again at the beginning of the competition taper to hopefully see some improvement.

3.  2K Test

Not a lot to it.  Sit down, warm up.  Row 2K.  Record the time.  Used as a proxy for VO2Max power.

4.  6K Test

Same idea.  Used as a proxy to determine Anaerobic Threshold power

Interpreting the test results

In the same chapter of Rowing Faster, they provide the following guidelines for interpreting the test results.  All of these are in terms of power.

Screen Shot 2015-11-09 at 2.27.14 PM

If the ratios are different, then the amount of effort put into the lower areas should be increased in the training balance.

Monday: 4×20′ / 1′ rest – Back to basics

Sunday:  Rest day

Monday:

Weather:  It doesn’t matter 😦

Plan:

  1. 4×20′ / 1′ rest
  2. slow start 5′ @ 2:15, 5′ @ 2:10, then 2:03 the rest of the way
  3. rate: 19-21 (on slides)
  4. lactate test at 60 minutes

Nothing unusual in the HR chart.  I increased speed by about half a second for the last 20 minutes to see if I could hold the higher power without my HR running away.

Screen Shot 2015-11-09 at 9.20.01 AM

In the first interval, you can see the steps at 2:15 and 2:10, then the rise after the step to 2:03.  I was actually pulling around 2:02.7.  Then for the last 20 minutes, I pushed to 2:02.

11-9

So, this is the third lactate in a row at or below 1.6mmol/l for a power between 185 and 190.  I’m going to target 2:02 (193W) for a few workouts to see how that goes.

11-9 lac

Tomorrow:  I will be starting a series of assessments to get a baseline before starting my winter training plan.